| Online Little Rock Historic Places Guide | |
I, W. C. Thompson...Discover more about Arkansas and the Civil War through this historical novelette based upon Civil War records, newspaper accounts and letters from the soldiers themselves. The guiding letter was transcribed in 1911 in Prescott, Arkansas, is in my possession and begins, "I W. C. Thompson..." Captain Thompson of Dockery's 19th Infantry Regiment is my great-grandfather. Why more literature about the Civil War? I offer the wisdom of another who said, "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." By Larry Jameson |
Home Civil War Books Red
Badge of Courage |
Part I -- Why War? I, W. C. Thompson, was born in Monroe County, Georgia, March 23, 1840. Moved with my father to Tallapoosa County, Alabama, in December 1852 and came to Arkansas October 1859. We settled in Ouachita County in the southern part of the state to farm the land. Even though it was May of 1861 when the State of Arkansas seceded from the Union of States, the seeds for the War of Rebellion had been planted many years before. Some folks lay blame on the use of slaves in the Southern States for the war but that really never was the case. Fact is, the federal government was okay with slavery in the Confederate States; they just didn't want to allow any new states to be able to choose. And then, of course, there were the radicals -- up North (John Brown) and down South (Alexander Stephens)! Never underestimate the impact of Uncle Tom's Cabin being published and fanning the radical abolitionist flames. You see, even before the colonies met in 1776 to dissolve the union with England, African slave trade was a growing business. Tribal chiefs in Africa were making money by selling tribesmen to England, and England was making money selling those people to what became known as slave traders in New England. The slave traders of New England, in turn, made money by selling the slaves to land owners, merchants and whomever they could entice into purchasing one or more. Of course those who bought slaves wanted a return on their money, so having the slaves generate income for the owner by working crops proved to be the best return on the money. Slaves were working in all thirteen colonies, and the main slave traders were in the North. Massachusetts became the first territory to stop using slaves. It turned out that slaves weren’t as profitable up north as down south because it was easier to farm in the south and the growing season was longer. Eli Whitney’s cotton gin (1793), and variations of it, greatly increased the production of cotton and lowered the cost of slave ownership in the South. You see--one cotton gin could do the work of ten slaves. Excess slaves moved to sugar-producing areas and out of the fields. Please allow me to ask you to think about this for a moment. Cotton production in the South in 1793 was about 10,400 bales; it 1860 it was 7,000,000 bales. What was the number one industry in the North at the time? Cotton textile mills. Where did they get their cotton? Cotton shipments to England were increasing at the rate of five per cent per year. Could a Confederate States of America establish a sound economy without interference from the North? Okay, I’m not going to give you all the answers. Just a little something to think about. But, I digress. The colonies were victorious in dissolving the union with England and got together May 25, 1787 to begin a Constitutional Convention to develop a guiding document for what was to become a new political entity known as the United States. And that’s when the heat really turned up for causing the War Between the States known as the American Civil War. Of the 74 delegates appointed to this convention, only 55 attended. Patrick Henry refused to attend because he was afraid too much power would be placed in a central government that would take power away from the states, the very thing that had caused the dissolution with England. Given the population at the time was concentrated in Pennsylvania and the New England states, most of the delegates came from there. The three most populous states were Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Virginia. So it really wasn’t a surprise when Edmund Randolph of Virginia proposed that both the House and Senate have members selected based upon population. William Patterson of New Jersey offered a plan of his own. Rather than have a House and a Senate, why not just have one legislative body in which each state had equal representation? Both of these plans would have concentrated the government’s power in the North until more states were added and more of the population moved into the new states. There were no states west of the Mississippi River. The South is where the new Union would grow because all the states would need more crops to satisfy a growing population and, as already pointed out, farming was more productive in the South. Roger Sherman of Connecticut offered a compromise. The new government should have a two-house legislative assembly. The House was have its members based upon population and the Senate would offer equal representation to each state. After a lot of arguing and such, this finally passed about the middle of July – nearly two months after the Convention began. Once it was decided how the members of the new legislative body would be selected another issue arose. Slavery. Virginia was one of the most populous states because of the large number of slaves working the farms. Forty percent of the population of the Carolinas and Georgia were slaves. With the continuance of slaves being sold by the northern states to the southern states, the population would shift, and the northern states would lose power in the new government. The northern states offered a motion that slaves would NOT be counted at all. The southern states saw what was happening and threw a fit. I’m talking a big fit here. They threatened to walk out altogether and stop the formation of a Union of States. Each state would simply have its own government and conduct its own business without any ties of any kind to other states. The northern states relented. Slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person and Congress would pass no laws ending slave trade before 1808 but each time a slave was sold, a tax of $10.00 would be paid to the federal government. You can find all this in Article I of the Constitution of the United States. I’m not making it up. But it was Article IV of the new Constitution that riled the most feathers in the days leading up to some southern states getting fed up with the federal government. You see, Article IV is what’s called the full faith and credit clause, and that means all states agree to follow the laws of all the other states. Clause 3 of Section 2 of Article IV states, “No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due. In other words, if a slave ran away from one state to another, the state where the slave was found would return the slave to the slave owner’s state. Over time, quite a few of the northern states refused to follow the Constitution and, consequently, refused to return the slaves. (Abraham Lincoln addressed this issue in the first inaugural speech and said, in essence, everyone ought to play by the rules.) |
|
| Back |
| Site Design by Arkansas Web Designs | ©Copyright 2003 - 2006 All Rights Reserved |